Partly due to the central function they play in U.S.-China geopolitics, pandas have benefited from high quality medical care and breeding and analysis efforts at services world wide. American zoos have, in flip, benefited from the elevated foot site visitors and income that pandas generate, serving to to offset the price of buying and preserving the animals.
In 2016, the enormous panda was removed from the endangered list and upgraded to “susceptible” standing by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. Because the panda’s survival outlook has improved, specialists mentioned, China’s strategy to panda diplomacy has shifted, with the animals coming to function extra of a protect for China’s human rights abuses and a instrument to challenge delicate energy.
Susan Shirk, the chair of the twenty first Century China Middle on the College of California, San Diego, mentioned that if Ms. Mace’s invoice handed, it might harm a “mutually helpful” collaboration amongst panda conservationists world wide.
“The elevating of pandas needs to be executed on the idea of science,” she mentioned, “quite than utilizing it as some form of leverage.”
Dan Ashe, the president and chief government of the Affiliation of Zoos and Aquariums, mentioned that his group didn’t assist Ms. Mace’s invoice.
“This laws would danger ending a longstanding program that has contributed to the conservation of untamed pandas,” he mentioned in an announcement on Monday.
The San Diego Zoo had pandas from 1996 to 2019, when its contract with China ended. Donald Lindburg, the zoo’s former director of big panda analysis, mentioned the enduring enchantment of the animals, for each the zoo and its guests, was easy.
“They had been extremely popular and plenty of, many individuals got here to see them,” he mentioned. “They’re stunning.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/13/world/asia/us-china-panda-diplomacy.html 50 Years Later, Some Query Worth of U.S.-China ‘Panda Diplomacy’