Amy Coney Barrett says Supreme Court justices aren’t ‘partisan hacks’ amid Dem court-packing threats: report

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett insisted Sunday that the court is not as partisan an establishment as many outdoors observers make it out to be, as Democrats proceed to direct their ire on the tribunal after a number of favorable selections for Republicans in latest weeks. 

“My purpose immediately is to persuade you that this court docket will not be comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks,” Barrett mentioned, in line with the Louisville Courier Journal

“The media, together with sizzling takes on Twitter, report the outcomes and selections… That makes the choice appear results-oriented,” Barrett added, in line with the Courier Journal. “And here is the factor: Generally, I do not just like the outcomes of my selections. However it’s not my job to resolve instances based mostly on the end result I would like.”

“Judicial philosophies will not be the identical as political events,” Barrett additionally mentioned.  

The justice made the remarks on the McConnell Middle on the College of Louisville. Senate Minority Chief Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., for whom the middle is called, was additionally in attendance on the occasion and launched Barrett. 

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett speaks during a confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Tuesday, Oct. 13, 2020, on Capitol Hill in Washington. Barrett spoke at the University of Louisville's McConnell Center on Sunday. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, Pool)

Supreme Court docket Justice Amy Coney Barrett speaks throughout a affirmation listening to earlier than the Senate Judiciary Committee, Tuesday, Oct. 13, 2020, on Capitol Hill in Washington. Barrett spoke on the College of Louisville’s McConnell Middle on Sunday. (AP Picture/Patrick Semansky, Pool)


The youngest justice’s remarks come at a time when the court docket is underneath hearth from Democrats who’re railing towards its latest selections, particularly a case a couple of Texas abortion legislation wherein the Supreme Court docket allowed the legislation to enter impact whereas litigation is pending in decrease courts. 

“Republicans promised to overturn Roe v Wade, they usually have,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., mentioned, regardless of the very fact the court docket’s ruling did no such factor and was merely procedural. “Democrats can both abolish the filibuster and develop the court docket, or do nothing as hundreds of thousands of peoples’ our bodies, rights, and lives are sacrificed for far-right minority rule.”

“The Supreme Court docket has thrown the door broad open to Roe v. Wade being struck down,” Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., mentioned. “Senate Democrats have the facility to repair this drawback proper now by abolishing the filibuster and passing my laws to develop the Supreme Court docket. We have to restore stability to the Court docket after Donald Trump and Senator Mitch McConnell blatantly stole the seats of Justice Scalia and Justice Ginsburg.”

Many Democrats made comparable feedback within the wake of one other latest ruling placing down President Biden’s eviction ban.

Barrett addressed that sort of criticism Sunday, saying she welcomes scrutiny on the deserves of the court docket’s selections and philosophy. However she defended the justices towards criticism that they act on any kind of partisan bias. 


“To say the court docket’s reasoning is flawed is completely different from saying the court docket is appearing in a partisan method,” Barrett mentioned. “I believe we have to consider what the court docket is doing by itself phrases.”

Democrats additionally say their antipathy towards the court docket is rooted in actions from the GOP-controlled Senate to verify justices whose judicial philosophies they agree with – together with Barrett herself – and block these whose philosophies they disagree with. 

The elemental offense, Democrats say, is that Republicans blocked Obama nominee Merrick Garland for a number of months earlier than the 2016 presidential election and confirmed Barrett in simply weeks earlier than the 2020 election. McConnell says the state of affairs was completely different in 2020 as a result of the Senate and presidency have been managed by the identical get together. Democrats say that is a flimsy argument meant solely to justify the GOP’s chilly political calculations. 

Associate Justice Stephen Breyer poses during a group photo of the ustices at the Supreme Court in Washington, April 23, 2021. Breyer has emphasized in recent months that packing the Supreme Court could decrease its perceived legitimacy. 

Affiliate Justice Stephen Breyer poses throughout a bunch picture of the ustices on the Supreme Court docket in Washington, April 23, 2021. Breyer has emphasised in latest months that packing the Supreme Court docket might lower its perceived legitimacy. 
(Erin Schaff/Pool by way of REUTERS/File Picture)

Barrett did enable Sunday that she and her fellow justices could make errors and mentioned they have to be “hyper vigilant to verify they’re not letting private biases creep into their selections, since judges are individuals, too.”


Barrett will not be the one justice to make public remarks in latest days. Justice Stephen Breyer has been on a media tour that included an look on “Fox Information Sunday.” Breyer, appointed by former President Clinton, has additionally been a goal of liberals not too long ago. 

Progressive Democrats need the justice to retire earlier than the 2022 midterms so Democrats can exchange him earlier than Republicans have an opportunity to retake the Senate. They’re additionally upset at Breyer for a collection of feedback he is made warning towards their court-packing schemes. 

“Properly, if one get together might do it, I assume one other get together might do it,” Breyer mentioned of court-packing on “Fox Information Sunday.” “On the floor, it appears to me you begin altering all this stuff round and folks will lose belief within the court docket.”

Fox Information’ Ronn Blitzer, Sam Dorman and the Related Press contributed to this report. | Amy Coney Barrett says Supreme Court docket justices aren’t ‘partisan hacks’ amid Dem court-packing threats: report


Fry Electronics is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

18 − 14 =

Back to top button