In football, though, a star of Alaba’s caliber at the end of his contract is always – if not a unicorn – the exception, not the rule.
It’s pretty clear why that pattern is held remains open to interpretation. Players tend to sign long-term contracts and clubs tend to want them to. After all, it provides safety for both parties. Players know that their earning potential doesn’t depend on a flashy, well-timed injury. The club doesn’t have to worry, every few years, about having a vat kept by an agent.
But that’s not the only reason. Contract negotiations rarely happen, though appear, over money; or rather, they are always money-oriented, not just considering money as an end in itself. They are always about status. A player’s salary is a measure of how highly they are valued by the club in relation to their teammates and peers. The same logic can be applied to the duration of their contract. The longer the team will pay you, the more you have to mean to it.
Of course, the consequence of all of that is that teams tend not to want players out of contract with them. As a rule, if a valuable player enters the last 18 months – or two years, in some cases – of a deal and appears reluctant to commit to a new contract, the club will seek to sell it. . Roughly speaking, allowing a player to cancel their contract is, in effect, giving economic autonomy to the asset, not to the investor.
Increasingly, however, across European football, that is exactly what is happening. Looks like Alaba opened the floodgates. At PSG, Kylian Mbappé, the standard-bearer for the sport’s first post-Messi, post-Ronaldo generation, made it clear that he want to leave for Real Madrid free transfer for six months that he even wrote a comic book on this topic. Reports spread throughout Europe every few weeks. an agreement was even agreed.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/04/sports/soccer/transfer-window-fee.html End-of-term transfer fee