Former Premier League referee points out two punitive errors in Chelsea vs Newcastle match

Newcastle United were denied a point earned against Chelsea at Stamford Bridge, as Kai Havertz scored a late winner, with two controversial decisions dominating post-match analysis

Loading video

Video not available

Thomas Tuchel on his future at Chelsea

The man previously tasked with improving refereeing standards across English football, Keith Hackett, claims David Coote made two major errors while Chelsea win Newcastle Flower.

Kai Havertz scored the winning goal in the 89th minute to boost the Blues after a week of turmoil after Roman Abramovich was punished.

Chelsea is still facing a situation that has frozen the Russian billionaire’s assets, with the club forced to operate under a new limited operating license.

But on the pitch at least, it’s business as usual for Thomas Tuchel’s side, who have cemented their third place in the competition. Premier League.

The winner, however, is a contentious one after Chelsea sided with the right side of two very divisive decisions in a close encounter.

Kai Havertz avoids a red card in the first half after elbowing Dan Burn

PLEASE SAY YOURS! Did the referee wrong both main decisions? Let us know in the comments section

In the last half of the game, mainstay Havertz clashed with Dan Burn on a header challenge, with replays showing him leading by elbow.

Referee David Coote decided to only give the German a yellow card, with VAR John Brooks deciding not to handle him.

Newcastle boss Eddie Howe wasn’t too disappointed with the decision but was furious after Coote refused to give his side a penalty, although Trevoh Chalobah appeared to drag Jacob Murphy down in the ring. ban.

And Hackett, the former director of PGMOL, accusing Coote of having a “mare” and claiming he took both of the game’s big calls is incorrect.

Hackett posted on social media during the match. “Havertz should have received a red card for his elbow in the face of Burn by Newcastle.

“During the second half, Chelsea’s No 14 held the opponent’s shirt and then used his left hand to push him over. No penalty kick awarded to Newcastle.

“We need Nigel Owens in this offense don’t we. It was an obvious penalty. If I were Eddie Howe, I’d ask Mike Riley to explain. “

Speaking after a narrow defeat at Stamford Bridge, Howe asserted that the process of keeping Magpies out of the game had “mocked VAR”.

“Probably a red but won’t scream from the rooftops,” Howe said of Havertz’s ordeal on Burn.

Newcastle boss Howe unhappy with officials after defeat to Chelsea at Stamford Bridge

“But the penalty, with the use of VAR, I can’t understand how it was not given or the reference was not asked to come over and review his decision. That makes a mockery of VAR.”

This result ended a series of 9 unbeaten matches in the Premier League, including 6 victories, helping them to over 3 points at the bottom of the table 9 points.

But with 11 games over, Howe is adamant that his side still has a lot of work to do if they are to avoid falling behind in the championship.

“On the ball, we could have played better but what gave us good results at the end of that year was our defensive effort and that showed up again today,” said the owner. Toon added.

“We are still in the relegation battle. We are under no illusion that we have to respond and we are looking forward to some big games ahead.”

Read more

Read more Former Premier League referee points out two punitive errors in Chelsea vs Newcastle match

Fry Electronics Team

Fry is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button