Livid cyclists slam BBC for ‘irresponsible’ Freeway Code questions

FURIOUS cyclists have slammed the BBC for what they declare had been ‘irresponsible’ questions in regards to the Freeway Code.

The questions had been requested by host Mishal Husain on Radio 4’s As we speak programme on Saturday.

Cyclists on the road were painted in a bad light during a BBC Radio 4 segment


Cyclists on the street had been painted in a foul gentle throughout a BBC Radio 4 sectionCredit score: Alamy
Presenter Mishal Hussain has come under fire for her cyclist questions during a BBC Radio 4 segment


Presenter Mishal Hussain has come beneath hearth for her bike owner questions throughout a BBC Radio 4 sectionCredit score: PA:Press Affiliation

Husain was joined by Kevin Fong, a physician and presenter and Rebecca Jackson, a motoring journalist.

They mentioned the Highway Code and the adjustments which were applied for cyclists, akin to how they will now ride in the centre of the road at sure instances.

Jackson received to talking about her household being cyclists in addition to drivers on the street.

Husain then requested her “Be trustworthy, what’s it that annoys you, irritates you, drives you mad with cyclists on the street? There have to be some.”

Jackson answered “The one factor I do discover a bit bit irritating is when it is four-abreast on a rustic street, it is nice enjoyable to cycle subsequent to your mates and it is nice to have a chat with them.

“The issue is, that basically does irritate street customers and motorists fairly a bit.”

Fong then turned the eye again to the Freeway Code, re-alliterating that the brand new adjustments will assist defend pedestrians and cyclists.

Husain once more went on to ask Jackson a query about cyclists saying: “Other than the four-abreast, what additionally drives you mad once you’re driving?”.

Jackson steered away from the query and spoke once more in regards to the “obligation as street customers, whether or not we’re a bike owner or a motorist – clearly the hierarchy is vital to maintain everyone secure – it is our obligation to look out for one another and be form to one another.”

After listening to the section, listeners took to Twitter to voice their criticisms.

Person Kirsty Lewis mentioned: “You would have executed an equally optimistic story on biking this morning in your section on the Freeway code on R4 As we speak – however as a substitute you blew it and inspired additional aggressive driving in the direction of cyclists. Cyclists are killed on our roads. Do higher.”

“Your merchandise on the Freeway Code was poorly judged. The adjustments explicitly attempt to enhance the damaging driving that results in surprising statistics for deaths and damage. It’s important drivers perceive how improved behaviour can change that.” mentioned one other consumer.

Kay Wagland mentioned: ” Sure! – clear assumption that cyclists are annoying. Did not ask a bike owner what annoys them about automotive driving. Hierarchy of duty & vulnerability of freeway customers is essential. Cyclists at a lot increased danger and do not harm our streets and local weather.”

The “hierarchy of road users” was introduced in throughout the Freeway Code change that took impact on January 29.

These most susceptible on the roads, pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders, and most in danger within the occasion of an accident prime the hierarchy.

The Solar has contacted the BBC for remark.

We pay to your tales!

Do you have got a narrative for The Solar On-line Cash staff? Livid cyclists slam BBC for ‘irresponsible’ Freeway Code questions

Fry Electronics Team

Fry is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button