Problems with the program House for Ukraine

“Better late than never,” said John Ashmore above CapX. After receiving “support from all sides” for its “reluctant” response to the Ukraine refugee crisis, the Government finally announced a plan this week to assist those fleeing the country. Russian war. Under a scheme called “Houses for Ukraine”, Ukrainians with a UK guarantor can apply for a visa immediately; others will then be matched with UK residents who have registered their interest in organizing a refugee. Servers will be checked and identity checks completed on refugees to ease security concerns. As a “thank you” from the Government, households that accept someone will receive £350 a month; and local authorities will receive an additional £10,500 in funding per refugee for services such as mental health support and education. There’s no limit on numbers – and within two days of the program’s launch, 122,000 people were offer helpEmma Yeomans says in Time. Among the first to be accommodated were Niyara Mamontova and her seven-year-old daughter Eleanora, who, after fleeing Kharkiv and asking for help on Facebook, were sponsored by a family in Hampshire. Mamontova said of her online appeal: “It was amazing. “A lot of people were there to help.”

Ian Birrell says in Paper i. Three million people were displaced by Putin’s atrocities in just three weeks. However, while other European countries immediately went to great lengths to help, the UK used “bureaucratic tricks” to shirk responsibility. “The government asked for biometric tests, documents, visas and visits to the application centers but it turned out not to be open” – seems like anything to “mess up” applications from people fleeing Vladimir Putin’s bombs. The Government’s tough and reckless response is not in keeping with the public mood, said The Economist. “Incredible Tory Supporters Called [it] “robots”, but that’s unfair to robots, which are at least as efficient. ”

Even the Government’s last resort won’t solve the problem, says Emily Carver Conservatives. Critics have raised concerns about the power of safety checks on potential servers and asked what would happen at the end of six months. However, it could still prove a “fairly good balance” between a “completely state-based open-door policy and a demand-pull policy”. Either way, this has to be a “shaking” crisis Interior Office into a better way to process asylum claims,” Fraser Nelson said in Daily telegram. For too long, ministers have tried to discourage asylum-seekers from coming to the UK by housing them in “rotten” hotels at the taxpayer’s expense, and banning them from working while in love. Their needs are reviewed – a process that can take months or even years. But as the Channel migrant crisis shows, that “containment measure” is not working. And with 1.3 million vacancies in the economy, would it really be that bad to let more refugees work when they come here? Problems with the program House for Ukraine

Fry Electronics Team

Fry is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button