Films about musicians, in particular, are famous for reducing the subject’s remarkable life to a glorified series of bullet points (a formula that is gleefully mocked by the inspiration for the joke at the beginning of the article). write this, “Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story”). In reality, however, other types of biopics are often only guilty of hovering, sacrificing depth to touch on as many notable historical events as possible. Suffice it to say, Steven Spielberg was never interested in making a movie like that. Instead, as he said Limit line in 2012, his goal has always been for “Lincoln” to feel like one of the many portraits one could paint of Abraham Lincoln:
“I’ve never seen it as a biopic. Sometimes I see it as a portrait of Lincoln, which means it’s one of many that could have been painted over the years of his life. president. I’ve done his entire presidency or his. whole life, that would qualify as a biopic.”
In the search for the right approach, Spielberg made several iterations of the film. One of the first such releases was a war film focusing on the last three years of the American Civil War, depicting no less than seven battles. Loved it with “Saving Private Ryan”, Spielberg admitted to Deadline as the script “quickly wears me and [it] It became clear that that was not the story I wanted to tell. ”
Among the other “Lincoln” scenarios developed was one that Spielberg described as IGN in 2003 while focusing on the former Abe’s relationship with abolitionist Frederick Douglass. One wonders how that repetition could have come about, since the final version of “Lincoln” was (not unjustly) criticized to shed light on the role of Douglass and other abolitionists in the struggle to end slavery.
https://www.slashfilm.com/951577/steven-spielberg-never-saw-lincoln-as-a-biopic/ Steven Spielberg never saw Lincoln as a biopic