That could take months. The men’s and women’s teams have held joint negotiations with US Soccer, but for the deal to work – the federation is looking for a single collective bargaining agreement that includes both national teams – the association Men’s players will have to agree to share, or surrender, millions of dollars in potential World Cup payments from FIFA, world football’s governing body. Those payouts, set by FIFA and exponentially larger for the Men’s World Cup than for the respective women’s tournament, are at the heart of the equal pay split.
The president of US Soccer, Cindy Parlow Cone, a former member of the women’s team, said in September that the league won’t sign new collective bargaining agreement with one of the two teams that did not equalize the World Cup prize money.
“We’re not on opposite sides,” Cone said at the time. “Sometimes it seems that way, but we are on the same team, we all have the same goal. It’s just how do we get there. ”
The players’ long battle with US Soccer, not only their employer but also the federation that runs the sport in the US, has propelled them to the top. a broader fight for equality in women’s sports and garner support from fellow athletes, celebrities, politicians and presidential candidate. In recent years, players, teams and even athletes in other sports – Hockey gold medalist, Canadian professional soccer player, WNBA player – contacted US players and their unions for guidance in an effort to achieve similar returns in terms of wages and working conditions.
“We strongly believe it’s our responsibility,” Rapinoe said in 2019, “not only for our team and future US players, but for players around the world – and frankly, women all over the world – feel like they have an ally in standing up for themselves, and fighting for what they believe in, and fighting for what they deserve and for what they deserve. what they feel like they have earned. “
A settlement appears to be the way out for the parties since April 2020, when the judge in the women’s case, R. Gary Klausner of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, rejected the argument that they was systematically underpaid and said that US Soccer vindicated its claim that women’s team actually earned more “on a cumulative basis and per game average” than the men’s team during the years of litigation.
The women’s team, in one of the great ironies of the case, fell victim to its own success. In choosing to take on US Soccer when they were at the height of their power as World Cup champions, the women also chose the worst time to line up a few years of their salary versus a few years. men’s wages, this was established competition.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/22/sports/soccer/uswnt-equal-pay-lawsuit.html USWNT and US football settle equal pay lawsuit