What can Ketanji Brown Jackson’s rulings tell us about her legal prospects?

Legal scholars are careful not to read too much into district court decisions. Tracey E. George“The idea that you can look at those things to determine if someone is a liberal or a conservative — that is not my experience,” said a law professor at Vanderbilt University.

During his time in district court, Judge Jackson seemed particularly interested in criminal cases. In 2018, she strongly rejected government effort to seize $180,000 from a drug dealer, which prosecutors say is the value of two pounds of heroin that police officers seized. Prosecutors argued that the dealer, Keith J. Young, purchased the heroin with the money used to commit the crime and would therefore have it confiscated.

“Despite the fact that the government seized the drugs that Young allegedly bid for $180,000,” she wrote, “the government contends that Young must also be ordered to pay an additional $180,000 as a form of payment.” criminal punishment”.

That theory, Judge Jackson ruled, “constitutes intolerable duality and perpetuates the doctrine of forfeiture beyond all reasonable limits.”

Next year, Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution places limits on the ability of states and localities to obtain and keep cash, automobiles, homes, and other private property used to commit crimes.

Judge Jackson called for the humane treatment of the prisoners, judgment in favor of a deaf prisoner who corrections officers kept in what she called “terrifying isolation, often unaware of what was going on around him and unable to communicate effectively with prison officials, the prison doctor, his counselor, his teacher or his cellmate.”

“Figuratively, officers” effectively shrugs and sits on the arm to this apparently deaf person in custody,” she writes, “probably satisfied to rely on faith not their own understanding of the best way to handle him and certainly do not participate in any meaningful assessment of his needs. ” What can Ketanji Brown Jackson’s rulings tell us about her legal prospects?

Fry Electronics Team

Fry is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button