What next after the High Court ruling on a Covid care home?

Hospitalized patients have been unlawfully sent to care homes during the Covid pandemic despite more than 20 warnings of asymptomatic Covid-19 transmission, the High Court has found.

The verdict has led to renewed calls for the former health minister Matt Hancock to apologize for his actions, and one expert has predicted the government could now face “very costly” legal claims.

The regulation

A 75-page High Court ruling found the government acted unlawfully in sending untested patients to care homes in England at the start of the pandemic.

Public Health England advise ministers opposed moving hospital patients who may have had Covid-19 but had no symptoms from hospitals to nursing homes as early as March 2020, the reported i news Side? site.

According to Lord Justice Bean and Mr Justice Garnham, there were more than 20 occasions between late January and mid-March 2020 when scientific advisers and scientific papers warned that Covid could likely be passed on without symptoms.

The judges said it was “obvious” that ministers were “alive to the possibility of pre-symptomatic infection and transmission”.

This “undermines” claims made yesterday by Boris Johnson and Matt Hancock, then Health Secretary, that they were unaware that Covid-19 could be transmitted by asymptomatic people, i News said.

What happens next?

The verdict is a victory for bereaved families who said care home residents have been “thrown to the wolves” during the pandemic. The guard reported. Around 12,500 nursing home residents died in the first few weeks of the crisis, the newspaper said.

Yesterday’s verdict is believed to help them make claims for damages. Michelle Penn of the law firm BLM, narrates The guard: “Should nursing home operators face personal injury claims of their own during this period, they are likely to seek a government contribution to cover those costs.” Therefore, she added, “the government is now staring at the barrel of potentially very costly claims”.

The Telegraph said the ruling has “significant political and legal implications” and means Hancock “can no longer hide behind officials”.

For grieving families, yesterday’s verdict is not the end of the matter, but a stepping stone. “In my view this government was guilty of gross negligence and manslaughter of my father,” wrote Charlie Williams, whose father Rex died in a nursing home in Coventry The guard.

He added that “the ruling gives me some hope in terms of the progress we are making in holding this government to account.”

dr Cathy Gardner, whose father died in a care home during the pandemic, is urging Hancock to apologize, he reported The times.

She said it was now “clear” that his claim that the government had thrown a protective ring around care homes was “nothing more than a despicable lie for which he should be ashamed and for which he should apologize”.

However, a spokesman for Hancock insisted the case “fully clears Ministers of any wrongdoing and finds that Mr Hancock acted reasonably on all counts”. What next after the High Court ruling on a Covid care home?

Fry Electronics Team

Fry is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button