William P. Barr’s memoirs are part attorney defense, part Culture-War Diatribe

Barr issued an extended apology trying to defend his stance on putting people to death by his religious faith. Pope Francis’ revision of the Catechism of the Catholic Church condemns the death penalty as “unacceptable because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the human person,” sent Barr on a good example of a haircut: “Terms unacceptable has no established meaning in moral theology, and is certainly too vague and indirect to be read as an attempt to quell the vast body of this established teaching, even if given it could be so. “

This is a pattern in Barr’s book: He seeks to reach the desired conclusions by carefully navigating a lawyer’s path around finely crafted differences, while throwing bombs on anyone he considers an enemy. “For all that comes down to his power, Obama remains the leftist agitator who patiently steered the Democratic Party toward illiberal, identity-obsessed progress,” Barr wrote. ; Undoubtedly, the actual “leftist agitators” who have frequently denounced Obama for centivism want a word.

Meanwhile, Barr’s version of Trump contains a lot of things: The former president may have an “inaccurate and one-sided style of speech,” even prone to “crazy rhetoric,” but Barr also believes that Trump has a “deeply intuitive appreciation of the importance of religion to the health of our nation. Barr thinks that “the country would benefit and be likely to see more of the constructive problem-solving style that President Trump previewed on election night,” if he “is met.” with an attitude of goodwill on the other side. ”

By “goodwill,” Barr is perhaps imagining something like his own generous interpretations of Trump’s behavior, which he uses at length and often tortuously to make sense. in his book. When Barr learned of the consequential phone call between Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky, then the President-elect of Ukraine, Barr said he argued for the prompt release of the transcript — largely because it allowed saw Trump, according to Barr, in the end did nothing wrong. on the call.

Yes, Barr allowed, telling Zelensky that U.S. military aid conditional on a Ukraine investigation into the Bidens was “stupid,” but “a quid favor is inherent in most foreign operations.” deliver.” Besides, even if such an investigation into a presidential opponent would be “politically beneficial” for Trump, it would also “supposedly advance America’s anti-corruption agenda.” ‘ said Barr. Making room for such elaborate fallacies is part of the reason why this book is nearly 600 pages long.

There are also plenty of places where Barr brings up what at first glance seems like an obscure detail but nevertheless makes for some odd omissions. He devoted page after page to the question of voter fraud, which he repeatedly claimed was a real threat, with a word about voter suppression. He described the inspector general’s report on the Mueller investigation as “cursed” while neglecting to discuss it. same report of the inspector general claims that the FBI has reason to investigate ties between the Trump campaign and Russia. Barr also mom about the fact that a bipartisan report from the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee conclude the same thing.

At the end of “One Thing After Another,” it becomes clear that Barr has something else in common with Trump – a keen ability to recognize when certain people are no longer useful to his purposes and a willingness to willing to share with them appropriately. Barr describes Robert Mueller’s “shaking” hands and “shaking” voice, wondering if Mueller “could be sick” – a striking (and appropriate) gossip for Barr to tell about a old friend. The final chapter features Barr throwing Trump under the bus, albeit lightly and with utmost decorum. Barr lamented Trump’s stubborn problems with “tone”, chided him for “unnecessarily alienating” “a large group of white-collar suburbs” and claimed announced that it was time to move on from the loser in the 2020 election by restoring “something like the old Reagan Union. ”

But Barr faces a tricky situation, which is explaining how Republicans can abandon Trump while keeping his fervent base. Result like deus ex machina The moment in an ancient Greek play, when a hopeless situation is resolved by the sudden appearance of a god on a crane. “The Republican Party has an impressive array of young candidates who are fully capable of pushing forward with MAGA’s aggressive agenda and cultivating civic unity,” Barr said. greater race”. “MAGA Positive Agenda” combined with “national unity”? Until I get to that point in his book, I wouldn’t consider Barr someone so desperate for a fairy tale ending.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/27/books/review-william-barr-memoir-one-damn-thing-after-another.html William P. Barr’s memoirs are part attorney defense, part Culture-War Diatribe

Fry Electronics Team

Fry Electronics.com is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – admin@fry-electronics.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button